Nollaig Mac Sheoin

"It says a lot about values and principles when a political party can agree to the next three budgets without the foggiest idea what will be in them....allegedly" - Finbar Markey [Political Activist] Something is something '-like', e.g. x-like [like the price of eggs - horror, like]; something is something '-esque', e.g. x-esque [like, in 'excessive force', the movie was Stephen King-esque, but dunno who the director of its budget was; there wasn't even an egg in the props list]; and something is something para-something. I dunno maybe even para- something or pseudo- something, and so that's why they're afraid...."A Para-superannuation-esque amount of x the GNP figures, minister, any comment?" It would be the phrase they're all trying to bury from their own scripts. Or, don't say, 'y', instead? Because it might not be a fact doesn't mean it might not be true. Incriminates French farmers, though, or someth...

To 'button-up' or 'unbutton' -equals or unequals?  Top-button, reaching your seat, belt-flap swinging as you walk, zipping-up, returning from toilet: Good move. However, start doing this in reverse, from your seat, as you get up to go to the toilet, unzipping: Bad move. Why is this? What is equality, light can't tell...? Is it something to do with expectation and consequence besides than the light of day and prime facie first impressions; something about the difference between walking from any of three doors into one room, and from one door into any of three rooms, and while consequence and expectation, besides than the cold light of day, tells why its different? Yet a video camera couldn't tell the difference in reverse playback, how come gay marriage equality might not be such a simple case of don't bounty niggas and homos for porn stats, but instead move along to brown babies and front marriage some law? Is it really as simple as telling yourself tha...

Considering the frivolous  article,  in   The Daily Mash, 17th September 2015 ( which opens:   'We Need To Look After Our Own ', see URL below) a nd, where concerning a viewpoint that includes an attitude whereby toward the prospect of ever taking in Immigrants, a  notion of 'Least Exclusion' is a Principle of Tolerance, applying ,  even, and especially, for bigots who might conjure such undeserving comment! A love-as-dare-not-speak-its-name points a finger-of-blame, and yet can stay-its-hand, protecting its own, first. How come it shouts about town, however, from the rooftops? It's supposed to be not speaking its name ? Unless its policy were largely based upon Convention...misleading, perhaps, its own confidence to any Principled way out of a fix...? What to do with Investment Cycle Price Discriminant types and their conjurable slurs of ' Homo ' and ' Nigga ', last century, and ' Paedo ' and ' Jihadi ', this century? Some...

Nollaig Mac Sheoin: Chillout Promotion Playlist [FREE DOWNLOAD] : FREE DOWNLOAD LINK HERE

FREE DOWNLOAD LINK HERE                                                   FREE PROMOTION LINK HERE FREE DOWNLOAD LINK HERE

[ N.B.none of the following should be found as any legal  advice  given ] The mathematics of being an individual alone is irrefutable and incontrovertible. There is no need when so knowing this at step one of day one, of the affair, for the appellant to ever conscienate the possibility that in bad cause he would refuse. He would want to have either been pretty dumb or to have sold out principles which are not his, but God's, to give away, for it to have had been bad cause. Law 1. Right to work: constitutional right to hire his own labour, unprejudiced in its availability to hiring the self as being precedent, and not antecedent, to others in so doing.* 2. Right against slavery: constitutional protection of his lawful preference in training is by the appellant, as argument, maintained.* 3. Onus: the onus on convincing any parties to change a position is with those who urge change* 4. Nature of incentive: the carrot and stick is not aptly ap...