Monday, September 9, 2013

Ransomware - W.H.O could do such a thing?

That disease would attack a moral position of a human behaviour in sexual reproduction -considerable as an underclass of stances or positions, to argue its purpose or function- and humankind not be vigilante, to be watchful upon nature so as that any equivalence of any scruple of her own design might not be misrepresented; images of cops are used in a revealing and telling scruple, as ought seem, surely, as needs must gather, and to answer to a call of nature, as which call asks to be viewed seriously, and appropriately, as unto nothing more than a divine joke, being, albeit, as a grotesquely unfunny and inconvenient one, as that which brings the phenomenon of ransomware to our attention as internet users.

Economists must be pursing their lips to discuss the purpose of money anew, now that ransomware can catch people wanking and ask for a fee to be paid for the pleasure of being watched while doing so. Is there no better purpose for the existence of money, than for us to assume that this must, surely, be what god, originally, intended it for; or else, that we might in its light immediately wish sooner to go back to its drawing board with a new idea. Or, are they just practicing for the bigger stakes in a protectionism letting us know how things work in those such higher places - and, as we might already know, perhaps?

I personally don't have an idea why money is meaningful, besides than to stave off destroying the world tomorrow, and, again, off, until the next day, when that comes...but that, perpetually, capitalism would seem to have no better founding for its point-scoring game -as seems without a counting system, overall, to be able to manage just fine. And, without needing a better reason to count things, as valued; yet, by half, by rote, and by system, not either providing for the needs of the people, and so deciding to starve them  instead.

If there's a moral to this story -that the system exists- that parameter as by which this such state of affairs can be allowed to manifest is surely sooner in the frame, and for wider interests of justice, than that ever a perp might be caught, someday, and so lead to the assumption that the public might be convinced that its such issue were taken care of. But, this, yet, ever-allowing for worse things, seeming on a slippery slope, and, getting more of a nuisance, each time, as it changes form.

Per word per minute assessing both paragraphs above for equal measure, and time-well-spent doing another man's labour: for it must, surely, seem obvious that I have been recruited, as commissioned, to review this phenomenon, by the makers of it, directly. And, this must mean that I have some important new role or position, as doing nothing else, in the universe, besides directing the voices in my head to separate the imaginary cops, as exist, besides, in their fiction, from this such a thing, as can be distanced from none of their deceptions, besides, as which none are being mistaken for. if that doesn't make any sense, then what did they want, exactly - evidence of a cum-stained rag?

Clearly, reading from this situation, a counter-threat virus ought develop into the 'lawyers' strain of the same game, and then their 'associates', and their 'associates further'; until they each might argue back and forth for liability exclusion and indemnity, or whatever tends to be good for this such sort of situation:- as i'm quite sure that none of those were involving with my desires to begin with, as might have had ruled, or governed, anything which i might have had had shame, repression, or guilt, for, so as to tap into, and, as a gap in any market niche, which any other person might exploit or benefit from, whether prospectively or otherwise; and, considering the progress and development of all humankind, in respect of which consideration,...

....we each now know: PayPal is not the only means, online, of electronic transfer of money; badges, crosses, and shields (amongst other pins and meddles besides) exist for representing cops; and law could not be gifted with a better online presence...no matter whether television-fiction-cops aren't -either- real, but that television ratings of people -fearing the terror of their freedom being threatened on a nightly basis, five-times-an-evening, reciting Mirandas, and learning how to conscienate 'address' and 'name' in relation to intonation and inflection, which rota they might compare its such slacking demand in the nouveau regime's medium. They cannot -but- be thankful for the mention, and, in such a benevolent advertising atmosphere, nonetheless. Not like television would claim their hands were entirely clean of any involvement in making television's presence of cops themselves, anyway - so why ought cops even be in the frame for a convincing denial of either of any such issue?

If they wanted to clean up crime on television they would have taken cop shows off the schedule, for one thing. But, nobody seems to be able to play cop like that, in the schedule-making-department, and to see its proposition as anything of a prospect of vote-grabbing -or winning popular ascent- for the rules already deciding, and for the physical realm of the surface of planet earth, and its governance. If they wanted to get rid of wanking they might have had invented sex-robots. besides, it would seem. But, then they aren't hinting at that being the route that the industry of online porn might -just in any hurry- be going down. Just showing everyone -at least once- by the drop-down-list of menu items, in the list of national sovereign titles, their such moral-code-enforcing police force logo; and relating other possible online credit systems seems to be much of the purpose served:- besides than as to be pleased by a business plan as which lauds its prospect, to its board, announceable, as merely within the lower-than-a-handful of percentage points of uptake in its revenue
possibilities, to return anything on its investment...

...somebody thinks that human behaviour can be moderated with viruses.

Hollywood would like to know -from Congress- whether this would be such a thing as would be a lawful response to copyright infringement - to attack it with, purposely. Are they implicitly asking if that such somebody mentioned above knows if there would be a 'director', maybe, or a 'plot', perhaps, to this such movie - or is someone knowingly playing God with our value systems, and, while yet also getting rich, and while unsupportable, politically, except to implicate the world -and their mother- as having had been involved with, or agreed to, something, along the way of its progress and development, but also to have had installed in their exit strategy a means to explaining their scruple as also having had plausibly invented AIDS?

W.H.O, could do such a thing!

Guide to Being Productive as a Hactivist on Facebook

Make 'agent provocateur' jokes.

If anyone recognises you, claim identity theft, and shout, stop thief!

Between Facebooking: Watching porn.

Feed the ass that law is -carrots- and then see who spots the lack of apples fed to horses.

False-flag conflict-and-tension-stirring need not pass the book, as its already moving.

Initiate class-imitative learning in consumer rational behaviour, so as both sides can interpret but only one another, and thus blame anything but market commerce for one another's humanity (or lack thereof) toward each other.

Engage needless witchhunts teaching moral panic how to react in the event of any science besides than the jobs-for-the-boys, big-budget-sciences, as have already politicians in the pocket for legal backings to fool the masses with.

Complain about the morality of children viewing porn, but don't even look at the science of adults viewing it beforehand.

Make some copyright laws, making some poor peons think about their sofas. Like its some insider joke. Nobody can count all of the money with a counting machine, even, as pervasive, as the internet. What of the pennies that get lost down the back of the couch for example. You see- copyright might be on to something. Roll down a shore?

Leave probabilities and protectionism to the pros. Or was it don't this? Which is more likely a taxation policy? Which is more likely to be Christian? What pressure to relate with the scope to interpret either?

When the poor complain of the inadequacy of exacting an emotive response, to emotional bondage, through emotional blackmail:- wipe their ass with sandpaper, and then ask them to pay up for the DIY costs incuring. But never tell them to whom need be any question -because they are poor- and everyone knows poor people's emotive capacity is biological distinct from rich people's - or was that their taste in music?

In just war, depicted through piety and violence in 'jus ad bellum', as 'warlikeness' only and not 'warfulness', describing war's horrors is always the best card pruddishness has, as a substitute, to avoid discussions of carnal knowledge.

The back of the herd are assuming of those who find time to read ancient things - who's quickest out in front, then - but the choo choo as ran away hasn't but only a fireman to hire to ring the bell and all is well - that's no hurry justified, now, is it - i don't even see any burning of the books, let alone justifications of them, let alone proof of expertise requiring to notice them.

If 'bread on the table' is too far-fetched a value to justify copyright by, then tell them its because the burgers are missing from the buns -that we don't recognise its politics as being as conspicuously lacking -as it is- as cross referenceable -but for mutual exploitation agreements.

Automate a shadow web so as to play everyone's and anyone's imagination versus themselves - thus ensuring all profits can win the race to the printing press and patent office given sufficient spying software.

Only superman can win this game of avoidance of promotional waves of technological propesnity to consume information on a technological sphere nominally determined by faux determinacy - you must watch - the television you are missing besides depends upon it.

The thief mentioned above wasn't the man holding the axe here.

If you don't compete others will - think about it...fundamentally, after discrimination contemplations -at length- bearing models of emancipation of the masses.

Map grammar to AI and stop complaining the gods don't have a voice. design one, and know to whom praise can be made.

Spying on a newsreaders to do list is not fortunetelling or prophecy but that the magic wand of the crystal ball is sooner revealing to the alchemist, who's work is not yet complete, and they won't tell you this. its therefore not their gold outright yet, is it? you can always go back and work for them after your laboratory experiments have shown promise without compromising the alchemist's dream.

Deep throat wants to do Anglo - does he even have a rod for that sort of thing?

NASA is not the governments control room, nor is the military. News rooms are where the information processes, and yet the half of it they don't tell us cannot be beyond their curiosity to, either. no wonder they think themselves so important. they probably are.

Dick and fanny went to the farm that day to see if cock and pussy were there. is this story bordering on innuendo yet?

To build a terminator robot, step one: lynx cans are artificial glands.

If you can't tell green and white issues have taken over from black and white issues, then what was so clear to you in the first place?

By comedians not laughing seeming funnier, what emotive expression was the joke onto to begin?

To a propagandist, everything tastes like chicken. to a realist, every person contains corn - but then that tells you something about the joke mentioned above too. don't ask don't tell; anyone who disagrees is either a liar or a fool; and to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Law is not logical these days, as having a gun to your head, even figuratively, never was, but in the show business of live studio performance, where the audience are at home and your family could possibly be your worry, concern, and distraction in oblivion.

State secrets train the audience to witch-hunt, when do we get to see the witches of science and art instead of merely government trained spies?

Maintain intermittently a second coming, or an alien invasion as prophecy, if only for the sakes of variation while AI remains elusive but on the horizon, and God was never not there, if anyone bothered looking.

Making friends with celebrity is one way of maintaining show business throughout the renaissance of the information age. it surely is propping up something of mutual interest.

If Auschwitz were on a motherboard of a grand counting machine that would be the earth, it would be preparing for the day when wanking is made illegal and internet porn records are the papers required to get on the train.

When the Messianic complex gets more messy, its really gets simple. don't forget there's a pilot in the model for a reason. god knows all things and at all times.

The philosophical differences of ethics of revelation in spheres of espionage must be less boring than either instance as item as issue. Can't its study also go on in secret, but to publicise at will?

If its only a toy gun, then why not also only do it on a toy plane?

Given sufficient reading of diverse fields of empirically observable phenomena, its not hard to work out that we are behind schedule, evolving, culturally, to emancipate ourselves; that is, if god has any plan at all, and law need bend to it, to maintain its sovereign claims.

If we don't apply class rights, we cannot complain of class warfare being an elusive thing to bring peace to.