Whether Fascism is Good or Evil is a False Test.

Fascism: FOR, AGAINST, or MAYBE? Are Fascism's argumentative valences toward favours really all that important, or is this just an aspect of a more general malaise, whereby that it is THERE, instead, could be affirming...for which, it might sooner gain recognition, and without such a smokescreen?

Pretending that nobody notices, that 'FOR' Europe, Fascists need not speak - as they are a monolith amidst the silence of her sovereign duress; for which, every time praise fails to find wisdom the cause of her Sovereign will, and not bondage, presuming, a stranglehold of licensed exploitations; every time phototropism fails to speak in the cause of the difference between of light and shade in different coloured human skin -in all members of humankind, and, not racism its excuse, instead, suggesting; every time X fails to speak against the cause of Y in the idea of Z; every time good men do nothing, evil prospers...

Every time a figurehead is endorsed, nominally -internal to any system- which assumes currency in a precedent of blame must tie its fact to hatred -for that it be its cause in justice to seem so -so God's justice is outstanding. The universal symptom of the system of capitalism is fraud - and yet the animal suffers from no other ill, so named, as which is its notion:- so therefore, tis a fraudulent system - it can be recognised, and not just a side-effect merely: but, also, its system's feature, bearing, its system, thusly, being diagnosable.

God's justice doesn't distinguish the fraud of 'blame' in any instance (hoodwinking 'forgiveness' in each and all) from the fraud of how the system suffers anything to begin, and in order to recognize its feature as founded in any instance distinct from its own phenomenon, more broadly recognisable; God's justice doesn't distinguish the insurance of industry from the ensuring of how that industry benefits to begin, likewise as being distinguishable in instance and phenomenon; God's justice doesn't distinguish the morality of blame from the morality of forgiveness on offer to the system, and its entities besides, as all humankind.

So extremists need not speak FOR Capitalism, either. And, yet it would seem -through all its system's blame- failing to transcend itself, and failing to imagine any alternative to itself, finding its causes amiss, and, with this, God's forgiveness of its system. God isn't asking if you 'can't prove a thing', you see, as -He already knows all things! And, so we need not prove that Capitalism contained extremism (or despots, or tyrants) -as Capitalism already did well enough on that account, itself. So, thus, in turn, and on the whole, it is beholdable, that Capitalism is a system which contains extremism, etc. -and yet it would prefer to deflect all blame on any such account. With God, no such 'smoke and mirrors' policy is ever effectual. No such Fascists speak AGAINST Europe, either, ever to fool Him.

If there were a cause befitting of any frame -of getting the personification of God out of politics- any benefit - the alibis are all yours, Fascism.

If, however, there were any noble cause besides, than for its political satisfaction merely, it would be equivalent to asking Mother Nature not to have a will of her own; and hence making pronouncements in science as though she had none; this ostending by such example as assuming that the wind were a cause, clearly, of nothing ever like a witch -but merely harsh and ambivalent, a cause, besides, as she ever makes ruin with her storms.

Personifying The Universe, doesn't make that universe caused to be brought into being. We aren't asked our almighty consumerist 'choice' on that matter (and this, even if we like to play our Holy-Joe-card, denouncing its own cause, booby trapped by false superiority in presumption of its preposterous reward), and, so for all Anthropic Principle Intellect as might argue its cause in Consciousness, asking any observer to turn instead a blind eye, bemused by dogma. The rise of Fascism either postdates or is concurrent with Anthropicism, and yet it seems to outlive itself, since. This is not intuitive -as The Universe is shown to be THERE, and, on a basis that we would not be here to observe it if it were otherwise, this cause is accepted. Fascism it would seem would rather have us accept that God is dead, if but only by whim of any suggestion of its endorsement washing the hands of its suggester.

The shorthand 'that God disallows anything', if ever he does, hence, can be elaborated upon, in that The Universe doesn't contain such a thing in anyone's opportunity, fictitiously or really, but that were it the case, it would observably be so. But, then, advertising has a lot to wake up to - and, when it might, finally, take its hoardings down, again -its productive job done, if ever. The 'THERENESS' of Fascism is more important than whether it is 'FOR' or 'AGAINST' any third cause besides, no matter how likely or unlikely its interest. To Anthropic Principle Human Intellect, as certain as that billboards stand in marketing commerce, it is observably there. Its supporting arguments in any wisdom, however, might not be.

We should have to get really dumb to accept Fascism. We have gotten really dumb. Do we put two-and-two together, that both these suggestions might, instead, be fallacious, rather than accepting either blindly? To put it another way, is it more likely -or less likely- that if we were to accept Fascism, we might more naturally do so, and without coaching on 'how dumb' we ought rather seem to be accepting of it? If it is the case that it would be more likely that we might accept it without needing seem dumb, we would ask ourselves - 'what has suggested the cause of Fascism?' and 'what has suggested the cause of dumbness?' Are they one and the same thing ultimately, marketing their commerce, in their patent laws' rule?

Proof of dumbness isn't proof of acceptance of Fascism, hence, but unearthing a cause of a double deception. Piecemeal for the innate sense of the caveman, and yet all the trouble in the world for the Fascist daring his cause seem popular. Whether false or true or good or bad, is it an interesting thing, however? It isn't. It shouldn't be obsessed about so much, then, as though, that it might be 'good' or 'bad' were keeping its uninterestingness hidden from itself.

In a world that makes 'illegal music', 'monetized wanking', and 'lawful rape' - whether Fascism is good or evil is a false test. That it is THERE- is the test as ought rather seem preferable instead.