Nollaig Mac Sheoin

That disease would attack a moral position of a human behaviour in sexual reproduction -considerable as an underclass of stances or positions, to argue its purpose or function- and humankind not be vigilante, to be watchful upon nature so as that any equivalence of any scruple of her own design might not be misrepresented; images of cops are used in a revealing and telling scruple, as ought seem, surely, as needs must gather, and to answer to a call of nature, as which call asks to be viewed seriously, and appropriately, as unto nothing more than a divine joke, being, albeit, as a grotesquely unfunny and inconvenient one, as that which brings the phenomenon of ransomware to our attention as internet users. Economists must be pursing their lips to discuss the purpose of money anew, now that ransomware can catch people wanking and ask for a fee to be paid for the pleasure of being watched while doing so. Is there no better purpose for the existence of money, than for us to as...

Make 'agent provocateur' jokes. If anyone recognises you, claim identity theft, and shout, stop thief! Between Facebooking: Watching porn. Feed the ass that law is -carrots- and then see who spots the lack of apples fed to horses. False-flag conflict-and-tension-stirring need not pass the book, as its already moving. Initiate class-imitative learning in consumer rational behaviour, so as both sides can interpret but only one another, and thus blame anything but market commerce for one another's humanity (or lack thereof) toward each other. Engage needless witchhunts teaching moral panic how to react in the event of any science besides than the jobs-for-the-boys, big-budget-sciences, as have already politicians in the pocket for legal backings to fool the masses with. Complain about the morality of children viewing porn, but don't even look at the science of adults viewing it beforehand. Make some copyright laws, making some poor peons think about their ...

The fundaments of geometry maintain at proportion; however, proportions yet maintain themselves within limits - so as to make for a workable industry in nature, which shows perspectives for its features as standpoints for schooled thought, from which then to argue their cause of best-praise-suiting, for the worship of their beliefs, that humankind might argue to repesent their cause.   The size of the universe limits: Where gravity limits, weight best suits those proportions as are lesser in the design of structure than certain limits, and materials limit themselves under such weight constrictions so as to show upper limits in each such material as possible. Arches and buttresses in building cathedrals cannot be too large; bridges cannot be too large; skyscrapers can only with certain technologies be so tall; and, ships can only be so large before materials and their buoyancy limit their size. The size of human agency limits: Where manipulability of agency of designer lim...

Do you want me To find a rock and crawl beneath it? Or do you want me To scrape the earth of dirt and eat it? Or do you want me To want you? There’s times you hold me Responsible for all your sadness, And then you hold me To ransom in a state of madness; When I just need you To hold me. When you want, and you need, When you wish, and you feel, Never coincide with anything that’s real. Never coincidental; anything but real. So you tell me To find someone to tell I love her, And you tell me The last is gone but I’ll recover; When I just wish that You’d told me. If it’s over All the things I’ve said and done to you, Or it’s over Everything I am and could be for you; Then it feels like It’s over.

  I saw the film pictured above ( The Hobbit - An Unexpected Journey ) yesterday and it left me more worried about the power of metaphor in literature than the worth of contract between warring fictional species. This is interesting as it can be missed how funny the joke of a dragon owning property is, especially when the dragon is considerable as a metaphor for all the jealously guarded gold in the world, all in a room doing nothing. Yet that it is the cause of such misery, retrospectively, and such antagonism, contemporarily, not to mention all that moves for good and evil to restore any balance, the mood of any legal discussion seems condemned, if not to be condemning. Its stance is forced to seem aloof and oblvious to the implications, at one and the same time, of its lack of stance in a real world, a world where gold still has the same useless meaning as it does in the fiction, whether its value is real or not. If it seems ridiculous that a dragon can ha...

If you fear for your safety - and run - and they're role is made to protect you - you're in the wrong, for fearing for it so in their hands?!!! Tale told, of said incident, on said day, 'the man absconded from the scene'...arresting 'a man on the run'. Tale portrayed on video, however; fear for our lives, in their hands, has us know better an instinct in our natures; "the man feared for his safety in the hands of those sworn to protect it, and his instinct lead him to believe his safety better protected by making distance between himself and the unreasonable threat". Which instincts cannot be argued with, when faced with irreasonability, turning violent, as is sworn to protect and uphold peace. Who's to teach our insincts to suppress? Who's to suppress our desires to learn? What suppression is this? If a gunman is on the loose, state needs give powers to certain chosen dutiful roles who might protect the public at large by having agreed pow...