[Note: Below is a Parody Comedy Satire Spoof to be read with tongue-firmly-in-cheek, throughout, even when I say this: like as with The Recovery of Political Economy, now more fully underway, and, since events in Paris last week -boom and bust, undoubtedly, cyclically, in toe, the content below is the stuff of Pure Fiction -the lot of it...honest!]
Consider the Role of the Extortionist
Despite any misgiving of our Intuitions toward issues concerning Pure Evil, it seems incumbent in our duties as End-Users, especially, that we must consider translating our Economies into something more readily extortable for The Blackmailer. We must consider Misogyny, Homophobia etc. - you know, Price Discriminants for which a Price Determinant Market can exist -one Account to extort them all- and hence for 'Niggas and Homos' (last century) - read 'Paedos and Jihadis' (this century) - so that we can all get along better in our respective positions as Blackmailer or Extortionist, or whatever our role, besides...
We should give Copyright's interests five years to get their Extortionism's house in order ...and...gladly...And, not to find ourselves remiss of perishable Career Opportunities missed meanwhile, or whatever disruption -besides- might inconvenience the art of only living once. As, whatever about that malarky...well - it would seem, it's clear: - you don't get to YOLO at all in some cases, too! Haha! 'Having-a-life', and 'Getting-a-grip', doesn't happen overnight for some Problem Cases, however. 'Who-to-trust', and 'What-to-believe' seem sooner more likely their plight, besides. Five years ought to seem plenty-of-time, after which to waste the rest of Eternity, having had noticed The Crisis, but missed The Opportunity in The Information Age of divorcing, once and for all, the False Economy of The King's Ransom. Better luck, next time, says you!...If we get another Eternity, that is! And, have our Payments on time, or expect more of this bullshit!
Have some consideration for He who must extort ye all nowadays. For, it can't be, at all, all-the-easiest job, for Him, doling out mercy, that He should be seen to find deserving compassion or pity for any of us. For, how difficult a job that-it-is-made, for Him, subject to new conditions of The Information Age, where we find ourselves, nowadays...Some would think that -with the advent of The Internet- that The King's Ransom and Blackmail and Extortion would just go away: - but, it's not so simply the case! If Copyright tells us anything, as an affair of a Counter-Revolutionary Movement in Commerce (and, one sold on slavery for glory for eight bits, merely, of binary code per transmission!) it's that it's business-as-usual for The Extortionists of This World ----expecting their lot to be as-it-were for the last 150 years at least, and then some! [Picture the command at Copyright's helm: “At ease, 'network as-is'! Nothing going on in this Meta-Consciousness as ought to seem, necessarily, Divine by any virtue of our imposing limitation!”]
If you would be kind enough in your Economies to translate yer Economies into numbers which are more readily extortable! Then, their conveniences can be put paid to, and be seen to be Transparent and Accountable. And, if not ready to be extorted for the next five years, then that's okay: don't panic we'll wait! But, meanwhile, if ye would just crisis-upon-command, just so as to empathise with the Systematic Exploitation of the Currencies of The World: this might show the pity and compassion due to their position. But be vigilant! Quell any rumour that Global Currencies of The World would unite and transcend The Extortionist - because National Borders define who we are as Peoples! Paris reminds us of this!
You would think the role of a hypothesis of a Monopolist Extortionist...who also blackmails himself (as, he's not immune, mysteriously, to also being merely human!) would suit the representation of 'The Poor Mouth', but this might always not seem the case! Cameraphiles are every bit also as Human as the rest of us. Even if they are not Porn Producers, they yet deserve compassion! I once knew of a cameraphobe who's particular secret fetish was that he had tendencies toward being a briefcasephile. You know, camera-on-the-briefcase, and so everything he did -filmed- he could watch it over later, while working out his Extortion Payments' method and procedure, not to mention Willingness-to-Pay. There are Efficiencies and Economies-of-Scale to consider for any Investor, starting out, you see!
We can all pretend to be 'Paedos'; we can all pretend to be 'Cops': - but we can't all pretend to be voting Fine Gael! Since the beginning of last century, we have looked forward to a day when we might transcend Money's arguments; and, there would be a day when there would be no Ransom to-be-paid! And, this, through a vision of Universal Properties of Networks, merely, following Universal Design! How wrong we were, that it might be so simple, and, yet, disprovable just to look at Copyright! But, as Copyright has shown us, things aren't always as simple as knowing that 'God is peace'! If we cannot implement immediately 'plugging all our Economies in Online', all at once, then we can at least wait five years for The Extortionist to get his Accounts in order, to keep on blackmailing us, and, then for Eternity, thereafter!
Is Our Particular Blackmailing Going to be Affected?
Monetary Systems don't discriminate against any types of People when laying down the Accounting Method of their automated systemised Extortion, besides, so we shouldn't like to be associated too much with any-such-a-thing as prejudice ...as there are lines to draw in the sensibilities of such things...as that such reputation for which History might remember us, and as proud and decent People, we were, sure ----and we weren't only 'Mysognist' or 'Homophobic' or any-such-a-thing --so don't, too much, hate yerselves, on our Account! Say, for example, if you don't already own an 'iPhone': - it's not too late! Its not too late to join in on the Blackmailing Economy. Iphones aren't finished yet their next run, so there's still time for us all to get involved, even at the lowest rung!
Small Business Loans can be made available to those who cannot afford to pay; Health Insurance can be rallied to, as though Universally, despite common sense; so, when we're extorting in-the-most wide-scale and broadest sense, so think of it as being like 'part-of-The-Human-Family', and don't consider that it is perverse to be extorted, systematically. It's just part of being Human. You know, not like The Internet is any different. Don't think 'Higher Intelligence', 'Symbiosis', and 'Universal Properties of Networks' as that shit is just opinion, and such flowery nonsense doesn't help anyone's Blackmail Stakes. Think instead 'Sex, Vice, Crime, and an Underworld, you know! It's Blackmail, Baby! They know...they're the ones with the iPhones!
Who's On Top?
If we don't have a blanket veil of fear underlying us, then we can't pretend at least to be normal and decent and hardworking, like everyone else, while offering ourselves up on-a-platter -to the highest or lowest bidder- neither is it an acceptable means to tend to the relationship in the New Economy of 'who-ought-be-seen, in a proper-working-diffusion, to be the power-on-top'! Working out 'who's-on-top' is what it's all about -isn't it? And concerning Online Internet Activities. and, if we pip-at-the-post by nanoseconds- everyone else -beating them in their path to Eternal Grace- then it's not a question for qualms or mind-boggling shuddering-to-think, but instead obvious. He who fleets the most, fleets the most to his benefit, potentially, and fleets the most so also to others detriment in their Eternal Grace before God. So, that's not a question...
We don't have to be considering the crude economies of attraction and dominance in feature:- as though, as Fat-Cats, we hadn't already uniformity and ties, to consider, to make as 'All Equals' to each one another, our relation, but, as we pervade...to the system of best application, so, that which ought to be seen as the 'dominant factor' -of-our-daily-lives'-travail- ought not to be seen to interfere with our 'Willingness-to-Pay'!
Events Transpiring
Scorpions, Torpedos, and Paedo Rackets! - nothing is without consequence when Extortion Rackets are not paid-up fully-on-time. Where is PR when you need it? Off gallivanting, Crushing Balconies, Burning Tinkers, and now 'more Killing-Sprees in Paris' seems to be the limit of their imagination. A second time! In one calendar year! Of the same Investment Cycle! If PR could keep visible at all times, we might not fear for the extortability of The World to seem in woe. Twice in three months UCD experiences mass-killing and, like as with Headshops bringing down governments - it hardly notices a thing! ---Don't worry, UCD, Paris has it far worse! And now...All better! On the same God's Earth! Before the same Global Audience! Oh, we are such fools!
Balcony Antics, Tinker-Burning, and now Paris again - what does it all mean for The Extortionists? Consider also their role as Blackmailers of The World! Is our Payment going to be affected, for example? I know that you're all asking yerselves these such types of questions. But, don't worry: unless ye all, already, have Diamond Investments Portfolios- your extortability onwards is most secure, or not so, depending as your Broker might advise such shit. You'd think things change with The Internet and talk of all this Diffusion! Diffusion-confusion, what are they like! Water-drinkers! Pfff! Do they not understand that the ways of a Cruel World will not be liable to change -just because we change in-our-method-of-communication? Silly! Just like gullible fools...they have to have everything made clear for them, don't they (as if the Printing Press hadn't already made thing clear in black and white!).
Paris doesn't stem from a vacuum. Scorpions, Torpedos and Paedo Rackets don't disappear from the horizon of our radar systems just simply to go across Borders or Underground -in whatever sense- but that events would transgress in their oblivion. A hypothesis of a Company Yacht in The Pacific -and with a resolve of Atlantic issues through reference to well-worn Political paths of The Falkland's Conflict -isn't sufficient to base dramatising the events observed. The Media Mogul's Submarine is more likely that which justifies the rate of Torpedo counting, preceding 'Paris Deux', The Sequel, as an event, (whether as with token or key relevance to events assumable transgressing prior and beforehand or not). Logical Paradoxes unresolved...? 'Paris Deux' is pursued instead...? Besides than that Humans relate in a class dualism between Rich and Poor, what might these Paradoxes possibly be?
Of greater concern to our collective progress as Humans, than the sexual habits of Newspaper Readers, are the eating habits of those whose extortion also makes up General Circulation. I was born for example not liking tomatoes. I ought to deserve every bit as much compassion in my plight being a non-tomato eater, as in finding the news repugnant. That I don't like either Brussel sprouts or cabbage, doesn't preclude against my treatment as a normal Human Being. It's the way I was brought up. My mother made them that way. It's not her cooking, as such, as I was growing up, but rather, it's just the way they taste bitter-sour, and your face scrunches up and you say 'URGH!'. I think I've spelt that technical term right. Others might react with some offence, to spell it differently, but theirs is also a valid position. Emotive Responses, in any, of us, can be valued, each on their merits, and in turn, but with the help of centrally disseminated messaging, also altogether and overall.
Status of Equals
Long-angle-lens-philes cannot be impersonated. We can't fake long-angle photos -so easily- as to photoshop things. Cameraphobes, and cameraphiles, and camerasexuals -are each -Human- as much as one another, and none were born without a Mother, so everyone can make certain a sense of equality, and also, on a basis of their extortability, a Price Market Dogma from which exploitation of their differentials in society, can be derived, so that value extracted can find a path of its determined flow, through hatred, taunting, slurs and even murder. If this was acceptable with Niggas and Homos last century then it's probably safe this century with Paedos and Jihadis just similarly. And, nobody seems to know what their problem last century was, either. If, conveniently to us rich Westerners, we don't bother asking, then, nobody might either notice. Moving along...
If born as a camerasexual, for example, then it might be safe to consider having had been brought up as a camerasexual, as likely. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that everyone who is a camerasexual must necessarily become a Porn Star! Some might live ordinary lives being extorted by cameraphiles, who, also, after all, are just Human, and normal, and natural, and equal – and, like the rest of us - their Payments must also be on time!
With extra memory in the kitbag, various arguments for nature and nurture would arise, and learned and innate behaviours would be discussed, sure - but know this: - as your mother has made you, and as God bestowed to you your qualities, that extra memory might not be enough on all occasions. You might need to invest also in some more kit, for when the occasion requires it.
Camerasexuals are entitled to their status as Humans just like the rest of us - whether counting the chips or not, as part of their upbringing. Camerasexuals cannot help being camerasexuals. If you are a Cameraphobe, to endure in a normal lifestyle, think about doing-it-in-front-of-the-mirror, or something, as a first step to getting over one's predicament. Or, maybe keep a tripod stand in the bedroom, passively and inactively, just to get used to the nature of being in the presence of such a thing...and, yet -while it is not operating- so as to adapt to life-being-a-cameraphobe. Not all cameraphobes are immune to Extortion and Blackmail, however, despite their status as 'Human', being secure.
Cameraphiles, cameraphobes, and camerasexuals are each as Human as one another. Some long-angle-lens-philes might indeed be classified as Robots -if working automatedly ----but this doesn't mean that they ought to be subject to Persecution. If God made them as long-angle-lens-philes - then that is how they are, simply, as being ---and, before any camerawork is considerable, besides; and whether such camerawork involves other technologies or indeed other Persons, so yet their status as long-angle-lens-philes cannot be prejudiced upon the Extortion Racket of their choice, and its Behaviours, but instead simply through their being of such status, their non-persecutable humanity is also what we must endeavour to aspire to when considering our collective Humanity and our duty toward Our Fellow Man.
Of course long-angle-lens-philes which are not persons but machines, are considered in light of their common sense status, too; and, notwithstanding any prejudice upon the art of being Human, ought their case impinge upon the humanity shared -with those who were born as cameraphiles, of any kind. Their mothers made them that way. They came into the world with extra memory in their kit bag. It can't be for us to judge how God has made them. If successful as an extortionist, then they ought also be considered as potentially part of Human Society, and in ways that benefit the whole of Society, as everyone can be agreed.
Camera-philes ought not to be considered perverts, as their status is derived from being of such a nature, rather than doing anything as such, predicating their necessity. Extra memory, and strap, and remote control operation equipment, also forms part of the necessary make-up of their being, of such status. The content of their work in any capacity of doing ought not to prejudice their freedom to be camera-philes ---while their Necessity in such capacity is so denotable. If not associated with any underhand, surreptitious, or nefarious Behaviours, besides than merely being of their status, then camera-philes ought to be allowed to live out happy lives, and while their Behaviours can be subject to monitoring and treatment, where necessary. Otherwise, we should have no reason to persecute those who take pictures of others in compromising positions!
Camera-phile behaviours are nothing new to The Human Condition despite the New Technology. In other ways, their Behaviours, and their status as being, dates from time immemorial. Look at cave paintings. They don't all have clothes on. We must consider their Humanity, the legacy of their position, and also how they might fit into Society making productive their capacity to be as human as the rest of us. Even with tripod stands in toe, this ought not to be a difficulty that we cannot surmount!
'URGH!': A shared basis of Collective Sheepish Repugnance - What Works and What Doesn't?
In any manifest study of Civilisation, it may be pertinent to consider, concerning the Investment Value of such Emotive Responses as are People's reactions to public displays, their repugnance. And, of the offence caused- as having had precluded, already, the design of a well-capable Statute-Book, which such positive law rules on, and, in Our Times, unchanged, we can derive, therefrom, a system of Taxation as can be taught – as which also can teach the rest of Society....perhaps including -in its Lesson- those with the most repugnant Facial Expression, or those whose hairdo doesn't prejudice their photogenic capacity, besides, to distract from the meaningfulness of the Lesson, intendable.
As our Emotive Response to eating foodstuffs, which variously we may consider we like and don't like -we can also base our assumptions on the safety of such law as usable in practice. Various responses to spit it out or to swallow any foodstuff so responded to tell us something of what we might expect as Public Response also in kind, to such repugnance exploited for purposes of making positive law. It might not be so-clearly-the-case with Criminality, however. We might not wish the picture of our repugnance to become quite so set-in-stone as to wish to make our very law-book from its Emotive Response, as its basis, entirely, merely, but for Society then to respond to the bitter pill of its lesson of repugnant natures, but only to spit the law-book out, and not The Behaviour.
I'm picturing something from the Hollywood Movie, The Nutty Professor, but only for its worth also befitting the term: fat lip, and not as you might think for its potential representing Males who are Black, confusing with the former subject, above, of blackmail. Conversely instead, maybe: lip service, bloating their bottom lip, with a slight ticklish, tingling, burning sensation – as Emotive Response – which convenience of programming in lip service midsts would substitute entirely for the worth of the semantics of 'Responsibility' in the Era of Global Consciousness.
Each case on-its-merits, and with each such behaviour -to its own- considered for itself, so we can form law-books, besides. For example, on a basis of our-repugnance-looking-at-homeless-people. Down-with-that-sort-of-thing. See how my face is 'scrunched-up' - and I would say – 'URGH'. Well, now you know what law is. It causes offence, thusly, I would say....
Other forms of reading law besides than scrunching up your face exist (and, no, sir does not consider that tomatoes ought to be illegal) - some Entry Visas for non-Human persons can also be designed... where we can envisage a world, where tomatoes would be free to cross borders like any other vegetable, and free also from pestilence and disease naturally....if, also, but to consider how we might also tweak their genes, so that they're not born living on the streets. The other non-human persons, not tomatoes, of course, I mean, who inspired this idea. It can't all be about homeless people. I mean occupy failed because they were living homeless, but we must prove also that mobile people are also failures. And then we've definitely won! I mean, made society better for one and all opportunities to be rich. I mean successful. Yes. that's what I mean. to say. Besides than 'scrunching-up' our faces, merely, to decide their fate in-the-eyes-of-the-law. besides than 'scrunching-up' our faces in an emotive response, reactionary and subjective, we can also form law-books by other means. We're working on those other means, as we speak. It's progress, baby!
Sometimes we get a feeling when thinking about things, and it tells us our place in the world. If I am on top, then I know I am secure in my dominance. If I know that I'm on top, often, then I can guess what law's position is -just by relating the prejudicial and typifiable status of 'what-it-is' that has caused -my face- to 'scrunch-up' and say 'URGH'. That's the technical term for the least-quantity syllaballic basis, and hence most efficient concise expressibility of its minimal sufficiency in proving a matter, a matter of interest to law, as best knowable, thus far, to humankind.
Putting 'URGH!' Into Practice
We ought all practice Emotive Responses so as to show that Law is on our side. 'URGH.' Now that we know what Offence is, so, we can also value 'the-other-feelings'. If your feelings, merely, can make you the richest - then they can't be all that bad, as Indicators!
N.B. 'URGH' is a Technical Term, and its spelling is Copyrighted, and Trademarked, and Patented. If you have an 'URGH' feeling of your own, you can also make use of your Offence, felt, besides than to consider Payment due to our Accounts (who manage 'URGH'), by spelling it differently, but to the betterment of yours and everyone's moral standpoint, toward offence------basing any law, besides than as testable by that such specific Technique.
'Scrunching-up' your face like you were eating lemons might not be necessary, but it may be seen as sufficient, in good practice. if you scrunch up your face and say 'URGH' - then you can know that law is on-your-side. reprehensible and non-condonable are the causes of 'URGH', and, also, each their features, as having had caused (rather than felt) such precious and lucrative emotive-responses, so long ago, when human-earthly-artificial makey-up-laws were first invented.
The 21st Century is every bit as much an era when 'URGH' ought to base each our moral sensibilities as any era before us. however, we do not have to go back to the dark ages to unearth the origins of 'URGH'. like any description of a good wine ought to seem also productive and intuitive, so, 'Californian blonde' will do, as the epitome of 'URGH', and those who already practice, in-their-faith, the ways of 'URGH' might tell you this. UCD is full of them. they must be quite so much very moral persons indeed. or else very gullible, I can't decide. 'URGH!'
You can tell what is deserving of legal consequence just by noting the rate of the spread of 'URGH' as a reactionary force in cultural expression. If The King says 'URGH' one century, and the people are yet made say 'URGH' the next, as a result of the same stimulus, as cause, then, you can be sure that the Sovereign will has not been put pay to, but such that extortabilty of its offense can yet seem ripe, and considering that it has not yet been eradicated, as a cause of offence, in any each and all our behaviours!
Saying 'URGH', nowadays, doesn't necessarily mean that the society you were brought up in was backward and defunct, even in the dark ages. you can still yet be a nimbyist even if you don't own a backyard! You can still yet base upon semantics each, only, ever, -all- your conflicts, pretended to, so as within mere mortal behaviours remaining, as emotive responses to semantic suggestions, and back-and-forth arms race emotive responses, even, but, such that those who scrunch up their faces 'the most' - are obviously those who are most offended, and thus morally superior, self-evidently. this is a safe test. they should be given the strongest most secure defence in their state, by law, hence.
If we have no other purpose for our laws, then we should practice various emotive responses, besides. as god values each our subjectivities, especially as we can practice wholesale or retail, locally or globally, centrally or uniformly, a response: to each say 'URGH', together and in synchronicity. Hence, we know such things as beheading are reprehensible repugnant indignant and morally undesirable behaviours, as indicated by our all saying 'URGH' together. Twitter has a read out of our saying 'URGH' together, ostensibly hence.
Hence, since we each contribute to Twitter, we know we are all moral persons preferring an expression of repugnance than chopping our heads off. that's what makes us moral. if most worthy of this expression, best expressed with a good old-fashioned Uzi. It's traditional! Ten people saying 'URGH', together, if you think about it, is a stronger law than just one person on their own, using the same expression. Think then how moral the world ought to seem that we can all say 'URGH' together, and know that such undesirable behaviours as which are the enemies are false and wrong. At least they don't know where it's at. And that's no place from which to command our fashions. For if we're gonna be moral persons, we must at least keep up with the tide of changing opinion.
The laws made on a basis of 'URGH' are hence -more strong- if we think 'more sheepishly'. 'Eurrrrrrgghhh'. God loves our sheepish thought! He values our subjective response. saying 'URGH' is not just the beginning and end of it! There is also the operation of an accounts-mechanism, by which, those who say 'URGH' can also, themselves, be subject to the nefariousness of extortionists -who would seem to be immune to saying 'URGH'. down-with-that-sort-of-thing! Those who are tasked with extortionist-behaviours (and I don't mean just the representation of persons who are black, but also black females as well as black males) can strongly represent -an indicator- as-to-the-position---of market signals, in tasks of extortionism, besides, than merely reading exodus from their Bibles, which isn't in itself a cause of offence. The extortionism as which inspires their religious zealot tendencies and allusion to modern faith, however, might well be.
So, practice it in front of the mirror....'URGH'....so that we may know who's moral - and who's not! Next lesson: Shock Therapy and the Etiquette of Good Practice in jumping, when told, and 'How High'.
