Saturday, July 9, 2016
Sunday, May 22, 2016
The Census Reminds me I used to be a Brain Surgeon!
"As a result of the Census Survey, I remind myself of a vocation, upon the news:- that I used to be a brain surgeon!"
As a direct consequence, and result of the Census-Survey, I remind myself I used to be a Brain Surgeon -but, for one day only at Beaumont Hospital. This is news to my network properties knowledge, but not scary to the prospect of propensity to consume Googlemetry from whatever local sources avail...'Camp X-ray' could be spying on me?...
Should I invite category and form, ---or, an audience? Where's that wisdom-tooth gone? Someone's trying to tell the genius-in-me -that there's money in promoting -the mediocrity to salesmanship- and telling 'JONESY'S WRITING A BOOK.'!
'Rothschilds' would like to hear that...Not that its about anything...a looker in the pink dollar got a revolutionary loyal following...not that its autobiographical in any way...It's not the shit! I've not to learn this, directly....But, there's also a school of thought that isn't music...'Murder Investigations' have suddenly become a class act in the recent 'Jonesy' wall and Blog-postings; if, only satisfying Conspiracy Theory fiction, or 'verdict in international justice courts on war criminality', and shit..
Only he hasn't 'the balls' to front chicken wire neon lights what the n-word does next...He's being painted either as a racist or a cocaine addict but which does the Census ask in survey? Enter 'audience with zion'. see jerusalem bells besieged at metal gates. ask for me. Ask for Jobe then wait. St Peter knows me. I'm the 'Hollywood Doctor', in a nervous unbecoming joke. But, its there. So, its funny. But, you get three steps. You always fail this. You're late. DOWNLOAD JONESYnms Tracks.
Its a tough one for wine!...Very close!...But, tough....The choice isn't with the question....The survey is clean...Check!...The survey doesn't say "my diamonds is innocent", -but that you might need ask, twice...-Ask 12 times, instead, and, then, change the subject to "outlying commercial interest"-beyond Health Insurance, as tender...That sounds 'right'...Water would like that amount of 'legal' consideration...I like where the audience for this crap is going.
JOIN JONESYNMS FANCLUB and keep up with where his 'Space' and 'Dreams' themes Music is gone to....
Saturday, April 30, 2016
The Budget: counting 'two budgets' stacking up, so, 'the third' is 'agreeable'.
"It
says a lot about values and principles when a political party can
agree to the next three budgets without the foggiest idea what will
be in them....allegedly" - Finbar Markey [Political Activist]
Something
is something '-like', e.g. x-like [like the price of eggs - horror,
like]; something is something '-esque', e.g. x-esque [like, in
'excessive force', the movie was Stephen King-esque, but dunno who
the director of its budget was; there wasn't even an egg in the props
list]; and something is something para-something. I dunno maybe even
para- something or pseudo- something, and so that's why they're
afraid...."A Para-superannuation-esque amount of x the GNP
figures, minister, any comment?" It would be the phrase they're
all trying to bury from their own scripts. Or, don't say, 'y',
instead? Because it might not be a fact doesn't mean it might not be
true. Incriminates French farmers, though, or something. Buttocks and
bullocks jumping over 'bears and bulls' fences to get to
filibustering Boston and Berlin. do they know where they stand? So
you shouldn't say it. Or maybe don't mention Gabon and gammon.
together -that'll keep iPhones happy. Or was it the IMF? Or was it
just 'Vine' and Fine brothers online, and then Capital Investment is
fine. Or what not to say, budgeting for what to say; what then is
said; what can be told. Or is it loose lips sink ships? Or
"fear-mongering prejudice-machine lashes back, to claim, once
again, its innocence?' Or was it just rhetoric? Who could say?...Not
one would know yet all would agree....X-like, x-esque, para-x and
pseudo-x - dunno why they need a budget, at all:- a decoy,
distraction, and assimilation, ought be more productive...
Because it had 'brackets', and they were 'parentheses', which encased, as to enclose, so the story had a budget to code its duty...Because it had a 'storyboard' and 'clapperboard', and, so could denote 'productive worth' to a sequence, so a film had a budget, in all any necessity, besides than financially, twit...Because it was a C+I+G economy with a GDP, so the billions had a budget...But, because CIA had loyalty, the Irish could read the gold market from the dogs on the street...I dunno if its budgeted-for. It might take a minister to say...How can they say that without even knowing what to say? Categorical exclusions! But, what about inclusions? Are they in their power, or their gift? And what about their bonuses? Resigning to the fact anyone this season? Viagra Sales Demand, not Dildo Sales Central for iPhones, the main minister's job when not also selling terror and porn? What else is new iPhones? Boring lot of "figurative"..."I'd say"s...And "literals"...And "dog-barking"...wait the House can speak! We can budget a 'noise'.
Because there was 'punctuation' so he was insured. Because there was brackets so he had a book. Because it was budgeted-for so they governed in perfect divine cosmic bliss! Without noticing despotism. At any 'boom-and-bust'-turn...Or, just, periodically, like when 'race cards' and 'medical cards' could not, instead, be told...Not, like, that they need one...A budget...For 'fidgeting budgeting' -the fingers could type. But, for 'budgeting fidgeting' -conversely, so, then overheads of literature's state would be needed, like...I don't know. I don't get paid enough for this, these conditions are brutal...
Brutal inattentions. And brutal oversights. And brutal executive decisions...omitted from pen-pushers positions. Brutal appreciations. Lacking but scant appreciable concern. Yeah I like that. Brutal intrusions. No part of privacy is not intruded upon. Brutal lacking of concern...The lack. the scant. the scathing. the dearth. the scarcity. the density. they don't describe their economy but only their jobs when budgeting. I'm keeping my budget. I like my budget. I'm not getting a new budget, same old budget, unless new or next to new the nearly new playing cards of the medical and racecard in election, my budget isn't racist. some of my best financial ledgers are made in budgets. Nowhere to be found in any the coming statistics, we just wouldn't know what to say...either....Can't prepare these things in advance. Have to wait and see, don't we...Like Hallmark says, from on high its perch in Elysium, only 'on time or not at all', otherwise we don't get a cut...And, so the Self-Conscious Calendar is not a budget concern this year, then...of course its not...Its imminent though, isn't it...?!
Counting 'two budgets' stacking up, so, 'the third' is 'agreeable'.
Thursday, March 17, 2016
What is equality, light can't tell...?
Top-button, reaching your seat, belt-flap swinging as you walk, zipping-up, returning from toilet: Good move. However, start doing this in reverse, from your seat, as you get up to go to the toilet, unzipping: Bad move. Why is this? What is equality, light can't tell...?
Is it something to do with expectation and consequence besides than the light of day and prime facie first impressions; something about the difference between walking from any of three doors into one room, and from one door into any of three rooms, and while consequence and expectation, besides than the cold light of day, tells why its different? Yet a video camera couldn't tell the difference in reverse playback, how come gay marriage equality might not be such a simple case of don't bounty niggas and homos for porn stats, but instead move along to brown babies and front marriage some law? Is it really as simple as telling yourself that you're equals to the light of day? The tool of reverse playback is also interesting in reasoning the aesthetic of a gymnast...but its not so helpful in reasoning the geometry of an athlete...For example we don't know where to begin explaining the elements of gravity and time to such an Alice in the Looking Glass: but we can comment on how nice her hair is as it flows from messy to neat again. How come we don't know this, and before we prefer our own minds to the evidence of its machine sense? Do we wish to mock AI to tell it that it is as blind as we are? And yet the sovereign doesn't even yet know that black markets exist...so money is safe...or was there something besides? How dogs bark on the street, and how a bear shits in the woods ought not be silenced so easily as gays themselves when gifting them an equality that is a Sword of Damocles upon bisexuals, also to bear. This is not to mention those neutral toward revelation - who aren't asked what stock price their preference but that their indifference is already charted before them, in price discriminants of a market already tested god's infinite patience more than four times now these last 150 years. Thank you very much. I was outed five times since the stock market decided it thought it knew the price of a homo. I was never in any closet. Nor am I gay. But then nor did I ever need words to limit my preference. Similarly, the faithful are rarely prophets, but only looked upon so, by those who never did believe.
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
The Principle of Least Exclusion Badly Applied
Considering the frivolous article, in The Daily Mash, 17th September 2015 (which opens: 'We Need To Look After Our Own', see URL below) and, where concerning a viewpoint that includes an attitude whereby toward the prospect of ever taking in Immigrants, a notion of 'Least Exclusion' is a Principle of Tolerance, applying, even, and especially, for bigots who might conjure such undeserving comment!
A love-as-dare-not-speak-its-name points a finger-of-blame, and yet can stay-its-hand, protecting its own, first. How come it shouts about town, however, from the rooftops? It's supposed to be not speaking its name? Unless its policy were largely based upon Convention...misleading, perhaps, its own confidence to any Principled way out of a fix...? What to do with Investment Cycle Price Discriminant types and their conjurable slurs of 'Homo' and 'Nigga', last century, and 'Paedo' and 'Jihadi', this century? Someone's Conscience is eased that they can protect themselves behind the scenes, but can they shout about it the woeful way in public! Deja vu Occupy!
She thinks she's walking-on-egg-shells, whereas cracking-nuts-with-sledgehammers is more likely! As comparative sloganeering: 'Bigots out!' is like 'Slave-drivers, go home!' It could be 'Murderers, out', 'Perverts, go home', conversely, if only that maybe the Interests, involving and participating in Copyright and Patent Laws knew who they were, but to tell themselves from Hitler and Churchill, perhaps, some lesson maybe already by now learnt!
The problem that makes it Irish: The Matrix would be spotted by us---if it contained any mistakes, that is... Contemplating Occupy with this story...E.g. Why now...? Why after Barry McElehinney (Shot dead, north of the border, 2013?), Why after Vedran Kohut (Died in M50 Road Accident November 2015)? Which of our own does she think she can protect? 26 counties? Seems an unfair bargain for ROI IRL IMO to me (btw, why URL?)
Versus 'Paedos and Jihadis' she thinks she's in with the heavy-weights, saying figuratively, as Irish Water might, "I can be racist, too". However, c. 1900, and we wouldn't discuss 'Homos and Niggas'. Yet it's not a different Economy, as far as speculative risk is concerning, except, of course, how observable.
Between a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing and mutton-dressed-as-lamb, you-can't-make-a-silk-purse-from-a-sow's-ear, but to risk throwing-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwater, but only to end up throwing even your-granny-from-the-bus...Where concerns such Investment concerns likenable to French Revolutionary times' 'Butchers, Bakers, & Candlestick makers', one must observe rules for 'Rock Paper & Scissors', and 'call a spade a spade', but do with a spatula what you will, within bounds of 'the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black', and 'jumping-from-the-frying-pan-into-the-fire', so as that the lessons of Liberty, Egality, & Fraternity are not lost on us in our times, for Security, Privacy & Free Speech are just as important to get in the right order; so hence, despite risking being labelled a 'murderer' even but to be complicit in all things, unseemly, but...the weather...?
If you were given a homework assignment to bash one of the Political Parties, would you save your favoured one first? Someone's Conscience is eased that they can protect themselves behind the scenes, but can they shout about it in such a woeful way in public! Or conversely, as a Hollywood Director, if you were given a film for an assassination-plot, and you had to pick a Party, would you save your own first? Or, would you, at least, see a silver-lining, woman - and apply 'The Principle of Least Exclusion', where tolerance is assumable?
"Least Exclusion" is a Principle of Tolerance, even, and especially, for bigots!
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/we-need-to-look-after-our-own-first-say-people-who-would-never-help-anyone-20150907101741
Thursday, December 24, 2015
Saturday, December 12, 2015
GOOD CAUSES FOR REFUSING INTERVENTION
[N.B.none of the following should be found as any legal advice given]
The mathematics of being an individual alone is irrefutable and incontrovertible. There is no need when so knowing this at step one of day one, of the affair, for the appellant to ever conscienate the possibility that in bad cause he would refuse. He would want to have either been pretty dumb or to have sold out principles which are not his, but God's, to give away, for it to have had been bad cause.
Law
1. Right to work: constitutional right to hire his own labour, unprejudiced in its availability to hiring the self as being precedent, and not antecedent, to others in so doing.*
2. Right against slavery: constitutional protection of his lawful preference in training is by the appellant, as argument, maintained.*
3. Onus: the onus on convincing any parties to change a position is with those who urge change*
4. Nature of incentive: the carrot and stick is not aptly applied in any dignifiable appraisability.*
Mathematics
5. One man task: a one man task is only ever going to be a one man task, no matter how much intervention upon it is argued
6. Individuality: the futility of acquiring self-referencing qualification: no piece of paper will tell him sooner to hire his own labour.
Philosophy
7 Business sense: Own business as he sees fit; don't change horses in midstream; steady as she goes, etc.
8 Initiative: The nature of work is a one man game and suited to its getting done that way rather than explaining all of its inspiration motivation and impetus away to others who won't either listen when told but instead rely blindly upon law to do their thinking for them.*
9 Experience: Ten years of independent study behind him, and more to go.
10 Confidence: Asserted in stance maintained, position protected, and course pursued already as being the right one.
11 Prejudice: While during interview his business competence was called into question by a box ticking pen pusher.*
Take no action
*(Note on 1 above):
40 3 1o The State guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate the personal rights of the citizen.
40 3 2o The State shall, in particular, by its laws protect as best it may from unjust attack and, in the case of injustice done, vindicate the life, person, good name, and property rights of every citizen.
45 2 1o The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing: - That the citizens (all of whom, men and women equally, have the right to an adequate means of livelihood) may through their occupations find the means of making reasonable provision for their domestic needs.
45 3 1o The State shall endeavour to secure that private enterprise shall be so conducted as to ensure reasonable efficiency in the production and distribution of goods and as to protect the public against unjust exploitation.
*(Note on 2 above):
42 3 1o The State shall not oblige parents in violation of their conscience and lawful preference to send their children to schools established by the state, or to any particular type of school designated by the state.
*(Note on 3 above): Being comfortable with my own predicament the onus is on any as might encourage change of my position to justify that change, and not on me to endlessly explain that being an individual I should as I see fit see to that being an individual does not change while others might argue nonsense. Justifying that it ought not be doesn't cross the Dept's mind, yet the legislation is relied upon blindly without ever having to count that each person is an individual and not more. I am not convinced but harassed and harangued. Concerning what laws can be relied upon to feel whatever confidence in one's position ought to be asserted as a mistakenly confident stance.
*(Note on 4 above): Were I in the wrong or were it a position which would then favour me more, the carrot and stick would be apt. Since I am not claimed to have done anything wrong, nor does it better my position, it is not apt to use a quid pro quo ultimatum to urge change in stance. It is patronising and belittling the choice and freedom of the citizenry of its nation that any government would so employ such tactics to massage their macro sphere situation to more palletteable figures maintaining.
*(Note on 8 above): The nature of being and expressing dualism, while the former part owns the causes of impetus while not intervening, and the latter part while so doing, encourages survival mechanisms which would not tolerate intervention and yet the task be completed happily. This should be an obvious alarm bell even to those who are not tasked with expressing as much, who sadly would be ignored in their plight, just like those unfortunately who can.
*(Note on 11 above): This is not an appropriate mood in which to spur on an emburgeoning business, as should be taking its first baby-steps in private and secret, and not out against the big bad world subject to ill considered bases of ignorance of his position from which to let seem stronger their position to belittle his. Suit against such liable and its prejudicial effect is not ruled out by the appellant.
Take no action
Fig: Take no action: the option not considered under the scheme as that possibly most suitable and appropriate to the needs of the appellant. Without this as an option, the onus would seem on convincing him to change his position. But no, it is assumed the poor don't know what's good for them.
NO INTERVENTION
Steady as she goes!
Fig: Maintain a steady course: the option not considerable under the scheme as the most suitable and appropriate to the needs of the appellant. With the path to success in his sights and intervention blotting it out, every good cause existed to wish them away!
Fig 2: How long can it take for the message “No Thank You, Interference” to sink in?
Fig 3: units slowing in production as they rise against a time line with greater production rate along the more horizontal parts of the blue line. The red line showing the date of initial contact.
Production counted by units of finished products of audio production slowed the most since the period surrounding 2008 when there was no computer to work upon. It is clear from the graph how this correlates with the time of initial contact with the Dept. When there is less interference there is more work done. When there is more work done, there is less interference. You could not interfere more with my work, but by taking away my machine from me.
BEFORE INTERVENTION (PRIOR TO 30/03/11)
SINCE INTERVENTION (SINCE TO 30/03/11)
Fig 1: I cannot get my work done: I already know what it is I have to do. Get out of my way! The appellant had only everything to show him good cause to refuse.
Fig 4: Who ever gave this the green light? The Counter-intuitive flow of Cost and Benefit of Intervention. Considering the effort and strain of being intervened upon, why punish those whom it benefits least – theirs might just be a genuine case too!
Squeeze to fit legislation
Expand to fit facts
Fig: Intervention is only ever on track to relate with legislation, not with the everyday normal routines of the real life of the candidate to be intervened upon.
There is only ever good cause in deciding toward the task which is aimed toward, with one's eyes open, alone, when it is going it alone is the task.
Fig: Welfare set out to intervene upon an attempt to climb Everest alone. But you don't understand, with the banking crisis and this legislation we must offer you a training course!
Fig “No minister, you cannot have “The Intervention” as a period in history, just put Pandora’s Box back now, you've had enough!”
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Emergency Construction Projects and The Story of Immigration.
Over a year in your Newspapers - and not once told the People; 'this is how to build a town -in a hurry -when you need to'. Emergency Construction Projects: - The Story of Immigration.
Rationalism
Instead, we're told how to be fearful of blowing yourself up walking down the street! That shit isn't rational: to fear that those two blokes you saw yesterday are already dead, and though you
never met them, you'll never get a chance to meet them again...
It's not rational! And, yet you're seeding Health Plan Agendas on its back as 'win-wins'. We don't have a 'centralised biology system': so why do we have a 'central emotive system' in fear? And, yet our institutions as would treat such things as anxiety or Post-Traumatic Stress don't seem to notice this and keep on validating its system decade after decade of TV...?
How come you can run three decades and more! A 'centralised emotive system', and nobody calls it out: that only the person fearing to not afford payment ought feel fear - anyone else can jump!
Protectionism
How come a million people fearing (with artificial emotion) to pay up is better than one person (with real emotion) being fearful, at the point of failed protectionism payment?
Is it because the Prime Minister fears the T-party spokesman, in the DoD, arguing the weapons contract deal, wants to bring a False Flag exercise - but the Prime doesn't need it on his watch?
So you externalise, project, and outsource, the emotion -as monetizable stock, at the point of evaluation (TV); The critical thing to evaluate could just as easily as fear (for your neck on the line)
as readily instead be something innocuously positive such as: 'love at first sight'.
Collective Encounters with Third-hand Emotion
How you felt when you first met them...Why would you want all the masses to feel how you felt when you first met them? Now all say this together:
"She had lovely eyes. I knew it as soon as I saw her eye's, sis". But, yet, you want them to feel -how you felt- when you sent them packing without payment, why is that? You could instead announce: -
"Now hear this: She had lovely blue eyes and he made me smile. She made me chuckle." What's fear got to do with the dirty sordid secret the audience are supposed to keep?
Why instead - I didn't have the money, she made me very afraid, and so now we must all fear together. But, we're not all paying together. So, why should we all fear together?
----Now hear this: My associate made me chuckle, when I met her that first day. Everyone is to chuckle together now. Hurragh! For the next bloody six weeks! As nobody has anything better to do than, bloody-well, to emote sheepishly! With their precious fucking second-hand emotions. Sorry Paris, I didn't mean anything against your Liberty Statue.
3D Printed Ice Cream
Its all in Plain English. and yet with a monolinguistic English-speaking Christian Calendar, binding mere mortals, pleasing: - who could not be getting it?
Why not centralised taste instead? And. then, fearing all that Ice Cream that we all keep having to share as suiting one particular taste in sadism and not another...
No? What's wrong about my trillion dollar suggestion hey? Is there something inappropriate?
its a win-win - 3D Printed Ice Cream for everyone, no? You get central emotions: - why not also get central taste?
Sunday, November 29, 2015
THE FAKABLE PURPOSES OF VIDEO EVIDENCE: 'The Baker's spent spatula problem'
The Problem of the Butcher, Baker, & Candlestick Maker - Do you call a spade a spade?...Or is it called a spatula, and when all 3 know each can use it better!...Either way you already know Rock, Paper, & Scissors..."Investment Practice, Hate Campaign, & Legislation" is playing Liberty, Egality, Fraternity's game, as though "Security, Privacy, & Free Speech" hadn't ever been learnt...
It's only worry and hate if you take the bait: conversely this filth-mongering is debunkable thusly: Can the proverbial 'Butcher, Baker, and Candlestick-Maker' prove 'family size' rather than 'fertility of idea' by making potent a lesson in fertile wisdom...a game...err...Spatula?:
Medium Debunked:
Secondary monetization in hate propaganda of spent assets of investment procedures in market niche studies 'The Baker's spent spatula problem' - who to pass it onto next, the 'Butcher' or the 'Candlestick maker'?
Content Debunked:
As linguistics, it bears claim upon sales-pitch not upon world-view, where this can be considered. It isn't a 'Likely Observable Human Behaviour', as phenomenon considered, but that it is necessarily for money, cajoled, externally-to-mind; and in the boardroom where semantics prior-to-cause are discussed, as when, besides, and when such 'Likely Observable Human Behaviours' are forming world-views, besides, views can be formed, not obstacles...
Attitude Debunked:
It's a 'family size index' not a 'fertility rate' - Suggestive Emotive Bias alludes to 'libido' comparable to 'stature' -as comparison- of insult - yet if you can't tell if what compares to libido is in any running, then you must be a great deal of time late, like, say, 14 years since 911?
Motivation Debunked:
The 'Fakable Purposes' take over from the 'Fakable Characteristics' as costing 'Video Evidence' is ditching itself for the discourse on 'why one might wish to portray fakeness in any videos at all'.
Purpose Debunked:
Of investment protocols, what to translate as the caption to any study, as hate messages, or as geography class instead, has a price in its market clears better for the fleeting idle gossip than the subject of science.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)